This just in: the Serial Rapists Union opposes DNA evidence

Ezra Klein, the other day:

Moral of the day: Selling access to government officials who are willing to contribute their time and power to the media’s cause is a bad revenue model for newspapers. Another way of saying that is that newspapers should not be funded by indirect government subsidies. But the whole brouhaha confirms my long-held belief that newspapers should be funded by direct government subsidies. (emphasis mine)

Which one’s more amazing: the audacity of someone who happens to work for a newspaper openly advocating for their livelihood to be paid, by force, by people who don’t buy the paper he works for?  Or the irony of the underlying favortism to an outdated model of disseminating information coming from someone posting a fucking web column?


About b-psycho

Left-libertarian blogger & occasional musician.
This entry was posted in random shots. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s