Coherency is for sissies…

A semi-random observation: when both Rush Limbaugh & the guy that wrote this — a brief consideration that growth for its own sake has the potential to mean socially what it means biologically — get to call themselves “conservative”, it just shows how little those type of labels mean.

The philosophical ideal gist I’ve gotten about Conservatism could be summed up like this:

  • Be careful about huge changes
  • Smaller social units tend to be more responsible, for obvious reason
  • Realize you don’t know everything

Yet the prominent self-described “conservatives” don’t seem to share much common belief beyond “CEOs are a persecuted minority”, “War is good”, & “Anyone who disagrees with me is a potential terrorist”.  Exact opposite basically.


About b-psycho

Left-libertarian blogger & occasional musician.
This entry was posted in philosophy/life. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Coherency is for sissies…

  1. Pingback: Psychopolitik 2.0 » What they think (IMO) again

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s