It's called "malinvestment"

Via Yglesias: Michael Mandel has up some slides about the US economy ca. ’97-’07 — popularly seen as a period of growth.  The gist: wage gains were functionally zilch (duh), as were gains of capital (um…what?).  If neither labor nor capital has anything of real value to show for this, it’s like a ton of money just vanished!

As we now know, this is because debt was treated as an investment rather than an annoyance to be dealt with ASAP.  I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t curious what Yglesias and his peers think about false growth as a general economics concept.

(cross-posted to FreedomDemocrats)


About b-psycho

Left-libertarian blogger & occasional musician.
This entry was posted in economics. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s