One “major” candidate has as his drill-into-your-skull buzzword “change”, then switches to agree with the capitulation the rest of his party likes. The other adopts “maverick” as his zombie term, and flips to blend in more with the flock.
One makes rhetorical pseudo-attacks on “old Washington” & picks as his running mate someone who’s been in the Senate since he was 11. The other constantly barks about experience and picks a running mate with less experience than his opponent.
Both engage in arguments over who is “elitist”, despite the obvious answer that anyone with a chance in hell of political power is by definition part of the elite.
“Ok”, so the still insistent on embracing the election may say, “what about 3rd parties?”. Well, the Libertarians nominated someone whose stated goal was “restoring confidence in government”. As for the Greens? Well…at least Roseanne endorses their pick.
Ain’t we got fun?